Focus and Scope

Gizi Indonesia (Journal of The Indonesian Nutrition Association) is an open access, peer-reviewed and inter-disciplinary journal managed by The Indonesia Nutrition Association (PERSAGI).

Gizi Indonesia (Journal of The Indonesian Nutrition Association) has been accredited by Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. Gizi Indonesia aims to disseminate the information about nutrition, therefore it is expected that it can improve insight and knowledge in nutrition to all communities and academics.

Gizi Indonesia (Journal of The Indonesian Nutrition Association) offers a specific forum for advancing scientific and professional knowledge of the nutrition field among practitioners as well as academics in public health and researchers

Focus and specific scope of Gizi Indonesia (Journal of The Indonesian Nutrition Association):

 

Section Policies

Front Matter

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Back Matter

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted are initially screened by editorial panel for scope, relevance and scientific quality. Suitable manuscripts are sent for peer-review anonymously.

The articles submitted to this journal will be peer-reviewed by at least 2 (two) peer-reviewers and check for originality and plagiarism.

As the journal is peer-reviewed, a double-blind reviewed process will be followed.

The final decision whether the manuscript is accepted for publication is under the authority of editor-in-chief with regard from editorial board.

The accepted articles will be available online following the peer-reviewing process.

 

Publication Frequency

Gizi Indonesia (journal of the Indonesian nutrition association) is published twice a year in March and September.The journal is available online starting from Volume 27 No.2, 2004

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Gizi Indonesia (e-ISSN= 2528-5874, p-ISSN= 0436-0265) is a peer-reviewed journal published by PERSATUAN AHLI GIZI INDONESIA. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Authors must submit ethical clearence from ethic commision

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed GIZI INDONESIA is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

PERSATUAN AHLI GIZI INDONESIA as publisher of journal GIZI INDONESIA takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the PERSATUAN AHLI GIZI INDONESIA and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the journal GIZI INDONESIA is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers Contribution to Editorial Decisions Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Allegations of Research Misconduct

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, performing, or reviewing research and writing an article by authors, or in reporting research results. When authors are found to have been involved with research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, Editors have a responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

In cases of suspected misconduct, the Editors and Editorial Board will use the best practices of COPE to assist them to resolve the complaint and address the misconduct fairly. This will include an investigation of the allegation by the Editors. A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. In cases where a published paper is found to contain such misconduct, a retraction can be published and will be linked to the original article.

The first step involves determining the validity of the allegation and an assessment of whether the allegation is consistent with the definition of research misconduct. This initial step also involves determining whether the individuals alleging misconduct have relevant conflicts of interest. 

If scientific misconduct or the presence of other substantial research irregularities is a possibility, the allegations are shared with the corresponding author, who, on behalf of all of the coauthors, is requested to provide a detailed response. After the response is received and evaluated, additional review and involvement of experts (such as statistical reviewers) may be obtained. For cases in which it is unlikely that misconduct has occurred, clarifications, additional analyses, or both, published as letters to the editor, and often including a correction notice and correction to the published article are sufficient. 

Institutions are expected to conduct an appropriate and thorough investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific misconduct, and taking necessary actions based on evaluation of these concerns, such as corrections, retractions with replacement, and retractions, Gizi Indonesia journal will continue to fulfill the responsibilities of ensuring the validity and integrity of the scientific record.

Complaints and Appeals

Gizi Indonesia journal will have a clear procedure for handling complaints against the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board or Publisher. The complaints will be clarified to a respected person with respect to the case of complaint. The scope of complaints includes anything related to the journal business process, i.e. editorial process, found citation manipulation, unfair editor/reviewer, peer-review manipulation, etc. The complaint cases will be processed according to COPE guideline.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions 

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness 

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality 

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity 

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources 

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest 

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Ethical Oversight 

If the research work involves chemicals, human, animals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript in order to obey ethical conduct of research using animals and human subjects. If required, Authors must provide legal ethical clearance from association or legal organization. 

If the research involves confidential data and of business/marketing practices, authors should clearly justify this matter whether the data or information will be hidden securely or not. 

Post-Publication Discussions and Corrections

Gizi Indonesia journal accepts discussion and corrections on published articles by reader. In case the reader giving discussions and corrections toward a published article, the reader can contact by email to Editor in Chief by explaining the discussions and corrections. If accepted (by Editor in Chief), the discussions and correction will be published in next issue as Letter to Editor. Respected Authors can reply/answer the discussions and corrections from the reader by sending the reply to Editor in Chief. Therefore, Editors may publish the answer as Reply to Letter to Editor.

 

BAHASA INDONESIA

Etika Publikasi dan Pernyataan Malpraktek

Gizi Indonesia (e-ISSN= 2528-5874, p-ISSN= 0436-0265) adalah jurnal peer-review yang diterbitkan oleh PERSATUAN AHLI GIZI INDONESIA. Pernyataan ini menjelaskan perilaku etik dari semua pihak yang terlibat dalam penerbitan sebuah artikel di Jurnal GIZI INDONESIA, termasuk di antaranya penulis, editor, ketua dewan redaksi, dewan redaksi, mitra bestari dan penerbit. Pernyataan ini didasarkan pada pedoman COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines untuk editor sebuah jurnal.

Penulis harus menyerahkan izin etik penelitian yang dikeluarkan oleh komisi etik penelitian

Pedoman etik dalam publikasi jurnal

Publikasi sebuah artikel dalam jurnal peer-review seperti Jurnal GIZI INDONESIA adalah sebuah unsur penting dalam pengembangan jaringan pengetahuan. Hal ini merupakan refleksi langsung dari kualitas karya para penulis dan lembaga yang mendukung. Artikel peer-review berfungsi mendukung dan mewujudkan metode ilmiah. Oleh karena itu, sangatlah penting untuk menyepakati standar etika publikasi bagi seluruh pihak yang terlibat dalam sebuah penerbitan jurnal, baik penulis, editor, dewan redaksi, mitra bestari, penerbit dan masyarakat.

PERSATUAN AHLI GIZI INDONESIA sebagai lembaga penerbit Jurnal GIZI INDONESIA bertanggung jawab terhadap seluruh proses penerbitan dan menyadari penuh etika dan tanggung jawab yang berkaitan dengan proses tersebut. PERSATUAN AHLI GIZI INDONESIA berkomitmen untuk memastikan bahwa iklan, cetak ulang atau pendapatan komersial lainnya tidak memiliki dampak atau pengaruh terhadap keputusan editorial pada sebuah penerbitan. Selain itu, PERSATUAN AHLI GIZI INDONESIA dan Dewan Redaksi berupaya menjalin komunikasi baik dengan jurnal dan/atau penerbit lain bilamana diperlukan.

Keputusan Publikasi

Editor Jurnal Gizi Indonesia bertanggung jawab dalam menentukan artikel yang akan diajukan untuk sebuah penerbitan. Keputusan tersebut didasarkan pada kesesuaian dan esensi artikel bagi peneliti dan pembaca. Dalam memutuskan artikel yang akan diajukan, editor harus berpegang pada pedoman dan ketentuan hukum yang telah ditetapkan oleh Dewan Redaksi guna mencegah unsur pencemaran nama baik, pelanggaran hak cipta dan plagiarisme. Seorang editor dapat berunding dengan reviewer ataupun editor lain dalam membuat keputusan tersebut.

Adil Editor setiap saat mengevaluasi naskah artikel yang masuk dari segi konten intelektual mereka tanpa memandang ras, jenis kelamin, orientasi seksual, keyakinan agama, etnis, kewarganegaraan, atau filsafat politik penulis.

Kerahasiaan Editor dan setiap staf editorial tidak boleh mengungkapkan informasi apapun tentang naskah artikel yang masuk kepada orang lain selain penulis, reviewer, mitra bestari, penasihat editorial lain dan penerbit.

Pengungkapan dan Konflik Kepentingan Lampiran naskah yang tidak dipublikasikan tidak boleh digunakan oleh editor secara pribadi tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari penulis.

Tugas Reviewer Kontribusi dalam Keputusan Editorial Proses peer-review membantu editor dalam membuat keputusan editorial. Komunikasi editorial dengan penulis juga dapat membantu penulis dalam meningkatkan konten artikel.

Kecepatan Setiap reviewer terpilih yang merasa tidak memenuhi syarat untuk meninjau naskah artikel yang diajukan harus memberitahu editor dan mengundurkan diri dari proses review.

Kerahasiaan Setiap naskah yang diterima dan siap review harus diperlakukan sebagai dokumen rahasia. Mereka tidak harus ditampilkan atau didiskusikan dengan orang lain kecuali atas sepengetahuan dan izin editor.

Standar Objektivitas Review harus dilakukan secara objektif. Kritik yang bersifat pribadi terhadap penulis tidak diperkenankan. Reviewer harus mengungkapkan pandangan mereka secara jelas dengan argumentasi yang mendukung.

Pengakuan terhadap Sumber Reviewer perlu mengidentifikasi kepustakaan yang belum dikutip oleh penulis. Pernyataan observasi, derivasi atau argumen yang telah dilaporkan sebelumnya harus disertai dengan kutipan yang relevan. Reviewer juga harus mempertimbangkan masukan editor jika ada kesamaan substansi atau tumpang tindih di antara naskah yang sedang direview dan dengan naskah yang diterbitkan oleh jurnal lain.

Pengungkapan dan Konflik Kepentingan Informasi khusus atau ide yang diperoleh melalui proses peer review harus dijaga kerahasiaannya dan tidak dipergunakan untuk keuntungan pribadi. Reviewer tidak perlu mempertimbangkan naskah yang memiliki konflik kepentingan akibat unsur kompetisi, kolaborasi, atau hubungan lain baik dengan salah satu penulis, perusahaan, atau lembaga yang terhubung dengan publikasi.

Tugas Penulis Standar Pelaporan Penulis harus menyajikan hasil yang akurat dari sebuah penelitian yang dilakukan disertai dengan diskusi yang objektif dan signifikan. Data dasar harus ditampilkan secara akurat pada artikel. Artikel harus mengandung informasi dan referensi yang cukup yang dapat diacu oleh orang lain pada penelitian berikutnya. Penipuan terhadap laporan yang dilakukan secara sengaja dianggap sebagai perilaku yang tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima.

Akses Data dan Retensi Penulis diminta untuk menyediakan data mentah yang berhubungan dengan artikel sebagai bahan ulasan editorial, dan harus siap untuk menyediakan akses publik terhadap data tersebut jika memungkinkan (sesuai dengan ketentuan Pernyataan Data dan Database ALPSP-STM), dan dalam hal apapun harus bersiap untuk menyimpan data tersebut untuk beberapa waktu setelah publikasi.

Orisinalitas dan Plagiarisme Penulis harus memastikan bahwa artikel yang diajukan adalah sepenuhnya asli, dan harus dikutip atau disitasi secara tepat jika penulis telah menggunakan penelitian dan/ atau kata-kata dari orang lain..

Publikasi Multipel, Berulang dan Serentak Penulis tidak boleh secara umum mempublikasikan naskah dengan penelitian yang sama di lebih dari satu jurnal atau selain publikasi utama. Pengiriman naskah yang sama di lebih dari satu jurnal secra bersamaan merupakan perilaku yang tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima.

Pengakuan terhadap Sumber Pengakuan terhadap karya orang lain harus selalu diberikan. Penulis harus mengutip seluruh kepustakaan yang digunakan dalam artikel.

Kepemilikan Artikel Kepemilikan harus dibatasi kepada mereka yang telah memberikan kontribusi yang signifikan terhadap rancangan, pelaksanaan atau interpretasi dari hasil penelitian yang dilaporkan. Semua orang yang telah berkontribusi harus terdaftar sebagai penulis. Bilamana ada orang lain yang telah berpartisipasi dalam aspek-aspek substantif tertentu dalam proses penulisan artikel ataupun penelitian, maka mereka harus diakui atau terdaftar sebagai kontributor. Penulis utama harus memastikan daftar seluruh penulis yang berkontribusi, dan seluruh penulis kontributor telah melihat dan menyetujui artikel final yang akan diajukan untuk publikasi.

Bahaya dan Subyek Manusia atau Hewan Jika penelitian melibatkan bahan kimia, prosedur ataupun peralatan yang berbahaya dan bersifat melekat dalam penggunaannya, penulis harus jelas mengidentifikasi hal ini dalam naskah artikel.

Pengungkapan dan Konflik Kepentingan Semua penulis harus menjabarkan dalam naskah artikel setiap konflik keuangan ataupun konflik kepentingan yang bersifat substansi yang mungkin mempengaruhi hasil atau interpretasi artikel. Semua sumber dukungan keuangan untuk penelitian tersebut juga harus diungkapkan.

Kesalahan Mendasar dalam Artikel yang Diterbitkan Ketika penulis menemukan kesalahan atau ketidaktepatan dalam naskah artikel yang diterbitkan, hal itu merupakan kewajiban penulis untuk segera memberitahukan editor jurnal atau penerbit dan bekerja sama dengan editor untuk dapat diperbaiki atau ditarik kembali.

 

Article Processing Charge

There is no Article Processing Charge (APC) payable for an article once submission is accepted. No fee is payable by the author, or their institution or funder to cover the publication costs.

Article Submission Fees

No submission fee will be charged prior to the start of peer review.

Plagiarism Check

All new submissions to Gizi Indonesia (e-ISSN= 2528-5874, p-ISSN= 0436-0265) are screened for plagiarism using editorial and reviewer system.

Accreditation Certificate

Gizi Indonesia (e-ISSN= 2528-5874, p-ISSN= 0436-0265) is a peer-reviewed journal published by PERSATUAN AHLI GIZI INDONESIA has been certificated as a Scientific Journal by The Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) since August 15th 2015. Updated Accreditation Number: 647/AU3/P2MI-LIPI/07/2015 Valid thru: August 15th 2018

References Management

Every article submitted to Gizi Indonesia Journal shall use reference management software Mendeley.

Copy Editing and Proofreading

Every article accepted by Gizindo shall be an object to tools writing-enhancement program conducted by Gizindo Journal Editorial Board.

Indexed

 

Journal Sponsorship

PERSATUAN AHLI GIZI INDONESIA

Sekretariat DPP PERSAGI

Grand Centro Blok B2 Jl. Bintaro Permai, Pesanggrahan, Jakarta Selatan INDONESIA