PERBANDINGAN ALAT SKRINING GIZI SCREENING TOOL FOR RISK DAN ON NUTRITIONAL STATUS AND GROWTH (STRONGKIDS) DAN PAEDIATRIC YORKHILL MALNUTRITION SCORE (PYMS) DALAM MENDETEKSI RISIKO MALNUTRISI PADA PASIEN KANKER ANAK DI RUMAH SAKIT DR. SARDJITO
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Intensive therapy in children with cancer in developing countries often leads to digestive disturbances, malnutrition, and other adverse effects such as decreased tolerance to chemotherapy, treatment delays, increased infection risk, and reduced quality of life. This diagnostic study involved 54 male and female patients aged 1-16 years with cancer treated at Dr. Sardjito General Hospital. Each subject was evaluated using the STRONGkids, PYMS, and SCAN screening tools. Statistical analysis was conducted to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of each screening tool in detecting malnutrition risk compared to SCAN as the gold standard. Overall, 61.1 percent of patients had a diagnosis of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Screening with STRONGkids revealed that 44.4 percent of subjects were at moderate risk of malnutrition, and 55.6 percent were at high risk. Meanwhile, PYMS indicated that 35.2 percent were at low risk and 64.8 percent were at high risk. Both screening tools showed moderate and substantial agreement levels with SCAN. PYMS exhibited higher sensitivity, specificity, and AUC compared to STRONGkids (89.1%, 88.2%, 0.925 (0.885-0.996) respectively). In this study, 31.5 percent of patients were not at risk of malnutrition, and 68.5 percent were at risk based on SCAN as the gold standard. In conclusion, the results from PYMS had higher sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in detecting malnutrition risk in pediatric cancer patients. However, both STRONGkids and PYMS demonstrated good specificity and AUC compared to SCAN.
Keywords: malnutrition, pediatric, cancer, STRONGkids, PYMS, SCAN
ABSTRAK
Terapi intensif pada anak dengan kanker di negara berkembang seringkali menyebabkan gangguan pencernaan, malnutrisi, dan dampak buruk lainnya seperti penurunan toleransi terhadap kemoterapi, keterlambatan pengobatan, dan peningkatan risiko infeksi, serta menurunkan kualitas hidup. Studi diagnostik ini melibatkan 54 pasien laki-laki dan Perempuan dengan kanker berusia 1-16 tahun yang dirawat di Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Dr. Sardjito. Setiap subjek dilakukan evaluasi menggunakan alat skrining STRONGkids, PYMS dan SCAN. Analisis statistik dilakukan untuk menghitung sensitivitas, spesifisitas dan AUC dari masing-masing alat skrining dalam mendeteksi risiko malnutrisi terhadap SCAN sebagai baku emas. Secara keseluruhan, 61,1 persen pasien memiliki diagnosis Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Hasil skrining dengan STRONGkids menunjukkan 44,4 persen subjek berisiko sedang malnutrisi, dan 55,6 persen berisiko tinggi. Sementara PYMS menunjukkan 35,2 persen berisiko rendah, dan 64,8 persen berisiko tinggi. Kedua alat skrining menunjukkan tingkat kesepakatan yang moderat dan substansial dengan SCAN. PYMS memiliki sensitivitas, spesifisitas, dan AUC yang lebih tinggi daripada STRONGkids (89,1%, 88,2%, 0,925 (0,885-0,996) secara berurutan). Dalam penelitian ini, 31,5 persen pasien tidak berisiko malnutrisi, dan 68,5% berisiko berdasarkan SCAN sebagai baku emas. Kesimpulannya hasil dari PYMS memiliki nilai sensitivitas, spesifisitas dan AUC yang lebih tinggi dalam mendeteksi risiko malnutrisi pada pasien anak dengan kanker. Namun baik keduanya STRONGkids dan PYMS memiliki spesifisitas dan AUC yang baik terhadap SCAN.
Kata kunci: malnutrisi, pediatri, kanker, STRONGkids, PYMS, SCAN
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Gizi Indonesia (Journal of The Indonesian Nutrition Association) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Gizi Indonesia (Journal of The Indonesian Nutrition Association) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to remix, adapt, build upon the work non-commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Gizi Indonesia (Journal of The Indonesian Nutrition Association).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Sidiartha IGL. Implementation of STRONGkids in identify risk of malnutrition in government hospital. Int J Heal Sci. 2018;2(2):18–24.
Kementrian Kesehatan RI. InfoDATIN: Beban Kanker di Indonesia, Pusat Data dan Informasian Informasi. Jakarta; 2019.
Robinson DL, Loman DG, Balakas K, Flowers M. Nutritional Screening and Early Intervention in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2012;29(6):346–55.
Raymond J, Morrow K. Krause and Mahan’s Food & The Nutrition Care Process 15th Edition. 15th ed. Vol. 68, Elsevier. Philadelpia: Saunders; 2020. 1216 p.
Khajavi L, Farhangi H, Movahed S, Salehkhani FN, Norouzy A. Nutritional status of pediatric patients with cancer in Iran: A single center study. Iran J Blood Cancer. 2020;12(1):12–7.
Sudarmanto B, Primavita C. Disease-related malnutrition in children with cancer: What’s the risk and the impact on patient’s outcome? World Nutr J. 2022;5(i2):42–51.
Song C, Cao J, Zhang F, Wang C, Guo Z, Lin Y, et al. Nutritional Risk Assessment by Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Associated with Demographic Characteristics in 23,904 Common Malignant Tumors Patients. Nutr Cancer. 2019;71(1):50–60.
Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2006;27(8):861–74.
Beser OF, Cokugras FC, Erkan T, Kutlu T, Yagci R V., Ertem D, et al. Evaluation of malnutrition development risk in hospitalized children. Nutrition. 2018;48:40–7.
Ouyang N, Lu X, Cai R, Liu M, Liu K. Nutritional Screening and Assessment, and Quality of Life in Children with Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Mainland China. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021;57:99–105.
Hulst JM, Zwart H, Hop WC, Joosten KFM. Dutch national survey to test the STRONGkids nutritional risk screening tool in hospitalized children. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(1):106–11.
Bicakli DH, Kantar M. Comparison of malnutrition and malnutrition screening tools in pediatric oncology patients: A cross-sectional study. Nutrition. 2021;86.
Murphy AJ, White M, Viani K, Mosby TT. Evaluation of the nutrition screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN). Clin Nutr. 2016;35(1):219–24.
Santosa A, Mulatsih S, Susetyowati S. Identifikasi risiko malnutrisi dan evaluasi status nutrisi pasien kanker anak dengan pengobatan kemoterapi. J Gizi Klin Indones. 2019;15(4):137.
Cañedo G, Palomino Pérez LM, Puerta Macfarland LA, Ruano Dominguez D, Cañedo-Villaroya E, Garcia Alcolea B, et al. Validity and Reliability of a Nutritional Screening Tool (SCAN) in Children Newly Diagnosed with Cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2022;74(5):1754–65.
Gerasimidis K, Macleod I, Maclean A, Buchanan E, McGrogan P, Swinbank I, et al. Performance of the novel Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS) in hospital practice. Clin Nutr [Internet]. 2011;30(4):430–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2011.01.015
Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol [Internet]. 2010;5(9):1315–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d
Ardi L. Tatalaksana Nutrisi pada Kanker Anak. Cermin Dunia Kedokt. 2019;46(9):616–20.
Wonoputri N, Djais JTB, Rosalina I. Validity of Nutritional Screening Tools for Hospitalized Children. J Nutr Metab. 2014;2014.
Correia MITD. Nutrition Screening vs Nutrition Assessment: What’s the Difference? Nutr Clin Pract. 2018;33(1):62–72.
Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(4):415–21.
Lestari NE, Nurhaeni N, Wanda D. The Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score Is a Reliable Malnutrition Screening Tool. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs [Internet]. 2017;40(1):62–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694193.2017.1386972
Nahm FS. Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022;75(1):25–36.
Tazi I, Hidane Z, Zafad S, Harif M, Benchekroun S, Ribeiro R. Nutritional status at diagnosis of children with malignancies in Casablanca. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;51(4):495–8.